Details about Ian J. Bateman

Access statistics for papers by Ian J. Bateman.

Last updated 2009-11-18. Update your information in the RePEc Author Service.

Short-id: pba280

Working Papers

2008

1. ANALIZING WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPACTS USING A MULTINOMIAL LOGIT LAND USE MODEL
   107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain, European Association of Agricultural Economists
2. The family under the microscope: an experiment testing economic models of household choice
   MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany View citations

2006

3. Household versus individual valuation: what’s the difference?
   Royal Holloway, University of London: Discussion Papers in Economics, Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London View citations
   See also Journal Article in Environmental & Resource Economics (2009)
4. Incentive compatibility and procedural invariance testing of the one-and-one-half-bound dichotomous choice elicitation method: distinguishing strategic behaviour from the anchoring heuristic
   2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association)
5. Investigating the Characteristics of Stated Preferences for Reducing the Impacts of Air Pollution: A Contingent Valuation Experiment
   Working Papers in Economics, University of Waikato, Department of Economics
6. The Affect Heuristic and the Attractiveness of Simple Gambles
   Discussion Papers, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham View citations

2004

7. An Experiment On Risky Choice Amongst Households
   Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2004, Royal Economic Society
   See also Journal Article in Economic Journal (2005)
8. Learning Effects In Repeated Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Questions
   Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2004, Royal Economic Society View citations

2001

9. VISIBLE CHOICE SETS AND SCOPE SENSITIVITY IN CONTINGENT VALUES
   2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association)

1998

10. The Assumption of Equal Marginal Utility of Income: How Much Does it Matter?
    Discussion Papers, Research Department of Statistics Norway View citations
    See also Journal Article in Ecological Economics (2001)

Journal Articles

2009

1. Editorial
   Environmental & Resource Economics, 2009, 42, (1), 1-1
2. Household Versus Individual Valuation: What’s the Difference?
   Environmental & Resource Economics, 2009, 43, (1), 119-135
   See also Working Paper (2006)
3. Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change
   Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2009, 58, (1), 106-118
4. The social value of carbon sequestered in Great Britain's woodlands
   Ecological Economics, 2009, 68, (4), 1257-1267

2008

5. Decoy Effects in Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation: Asymmetric Dominance
   Land Economics, 2008, 84, (1), 115-127
6. Estimating the range of economic impacts on farms of nutrient leaching reduction policies
   Agricultural Economics, 2008, 39, (2), 197-205
7. Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness
   Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2008, 55, (2), 127-141 View citations

2007

8. Beyond implicit prices: recovering theoretically consistent and transferable values for noise avoidance from a hedonic property price model
   Environmental & Resource Economics, 2007, 37, (1), 211-232 View citations
9. Can ranking techniques elicit robust values?
   Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2007, 34, (1), 49-66 View citations
10. Introduction to the special issue in honour of David W. Pearce: environmental economics and policy
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2007, 37, (1), 1-6

2006

11. Analysing the Agricultural Costs and Non-market Benefits of Implementing the Water Framework Directive
    Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2006, 57, (2), 221-237 View citations
12. Consistency and construction in stated WTP for health risk reductions: A novel scope-sensitivity test
    Resource and Energy Economics, 2006, 28, (3), 199-214 View citations
13. The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP
    Ecological Economics, 2006, 60, (2), 450-460 View citations

2005

14. A ‘Natural Experiment’ Approach to Contingent Valuation of Private and Public UV Health Risk Reduction Strategies in Low and High Risk Countries
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2005, 31, (1), 47-72 View citations
15. An Experiment on Risky Choice Amongst Households
    Economic Journal, 2005, 115, (502), C176-C189 View citations
    See also Working Paper (2004)
16. Benefits transfer of willingness to pay estimates and functions for health-risk reductions: a cross-country study
    Journal of Health Economics, 2005, 24, (3), 591-611 View citations
17. Editorial: Professor David W. Pearce
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2005, 32, (4), 443-444
18. Testing competing models of loss aversion: an adversarial collaboration
    Journal of Public Economics, 2005, 89, (8), 1561-1580 View citations

2004

19. First impressions count: interviewer appearance and information effects in stated preference studies
    Ecological Economics, 2004, 49, (1), 47-55 View citations
20. Investigating Insensitivity to Scope: A Split-Sample Test of Perceived Scheme Realism
    Land Economics, 2004, 80, (2), 258-271 View citations
21. On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity
    Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2004, 47, (1), 71-93 View citations
22. The structure of motivation for contingent values: a case study of lake water quality improvement
    Ecological Economics, 2004, 50, (1-2), 69-82 View citations

2003

23. Contrasting Conventional with Multi-Level Modeling Approaches to Meta-Analysis: Expectation Consistency in U.K. Woodland Recreation Values
    Land Economics, 2003, 79, (2), 235-258 View citations
24. Editor's Note
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2003, 25, (3), 255-256
25. Ordering effects in nested 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' contingent valuation designs
    Ecological Economics, 2003, 45, (2), 255-270 View citations

2002

26. Applying Geographical Information Systems (GIS) to Environmental and Resource Economics
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 2002, 22, (1), 219-269 View citations
27. Modelling environmental equity: access to air quality in Birmingham, England
    Environment and Planning A, 2002, 34, (4), 695-716

2001

28. Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation
    Resource and Energy Economics, 2001, 23, (3), 191-213 View citations
29. Integrating stakeholder analysis in non-market valuation of environmental assets
    Ecological Economics, 2001, 37, (1), 123-138 View citations
30. The assumption of equal marginal utility of income: how much does it matter?
    Ecological Economics, 2001, 36, (3), 397-411 View citations
    See also Working Paper (1998)
31. Use and nonuse values for conserving endangered species: the case of the Mediterranean monk seal
    Environment and Planning A, 2001, 33, (12), 2219-2233

2000

32. Coastal bathing water health risks: developing means of assessing the adequacy of proposals to amend the 1976 EC directive
    Risk, Decision and Policy, 2000, 5, (01), 49-68 View citations
33. Efficiency Gains Afforded by Improved Bid Design versus Follow-up Valuation Questions in Discrete-Choice CV Studies
    Land Economics, 2000, 76, (2), 299-311 View citations
34. Estimating Four Hicksian Welfare Measures for a Public Good: A Contingent Valuation Investigation
    Land Economics, 2000, 76, (3), 355-373 View citations
35. Improving land compensation procedures via GIS and hedonic pricing
    Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2000, 18, (6), 681-696 View citations

1999

36. Developing a Methodology for Benefit Transfers Using Geographical Information Systems: Modelling Demand for Woodland Recreation
    Regional Studies, 1999, 33, (3), 191-205
37. Managing nutrient fluxes and pollution in the Baltic: an interdisciplinary simulation study
    Ecological Economics, 1999, 30, (2), 333-352 View citations
38. Modelling and Mapping Agricultural Output Values Using Farm Specific Details and Environmental Databases
    Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999, 50, (3), 488-511 View citations
39. Public Attitudes to Contingent Valuation and Public Consultation
    Environmental Values, 1999, 8, (3), 325-347 View citations

1998

40. Determinants of individuals' willingness to pay for perceived reductions in environmental health risks: a case study of bathing water quality
    Environment and Planning A, 1998, 30, (4), 577-594 View citations
41. Improved Estimation of Willingness to Pay in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies
    Land Economics, 1998, 74, (1), 65-75 View citations
42. Multivariate Mixed Models for Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Data: Willingness To Pay For Conservation of Monk Seals
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 1998, 12, (4), 443-456 View citations

1997

43. A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences
    The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112, (2), 479-505 View citations
44. Budget-constraint, temporal, and question-ordering effects in contingent valuation studies
    Environment and Planning A, 1997, 29, (7), 1215-1228 View citations
45. Does Part-Whole Bias Exist? An Experimental Investigation
    Economic Journal, 1997, 107, (441), 322-32 View citations
46. Non-users' Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation Method
    Regional Studies, 1997, 31, (6), 571-582 View citations
47. REAL AND HYPOTHETICAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION: A NON-EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON
    Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997, 48, (1-3), 123-137 View citations

1996

48. A multilevel modelling approach to triple-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 1996, 7, (3), 197-211 View citations
49. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
    Ecological Economics, 1996, 19, (3), 265-267
    Also in Ecological Economics, 1995, 12, (2), 161-179 (1995) View citations
50. MEASUREMENT ISSUES IN THE TRAVEL COST METHOD: A GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPROACH
    Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1996, 47, (1-4), 191-205 View citations

1995

51. Empirical and public choice evidence for hyperbolic social discount rates and the implications for intergenerational discounting
    Environmental & Resource Economics, 1995, 5, (4), 413-423 View citations

1994

52. Consistency Between Contingent Valuation Estimates: A Comparison of Two Studies of UK National Parks
    Regional Studies, 1994, 28, (5), 457-474 View citations

Editor

1. Environmental & Resource Economics
   European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists