Voting over Economic Plans

Richard Boylan () and Richard D McKelvey

American Economic Review, 1995, vol. 85, issue 4, pages 860-71

Abstract: The authors review and provide motivation for a one-sector model of economic growth in which decisions about capital accumulation are made by a political process. If it is possible to commit for at least three periods into the future, then, for any feasible consumption plan, there is a perturbation that is majority-preferred to it. Furthermore, plans that minimize the maximum vote that can be obtained against them yield a political business cycle. If it is impossible to commit, voters select the optimal consumption plan for the median voter. Copyright 1995 by American Economic Association.

Date: 1995
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%2819950 ... O%3B2-B&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:85:y:1995:i:4:p:860-71

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is edited by Robert Moffitt

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().