Stationary Concepts for Experimental 2x2-Games

Reinhard Selten and Thorsten Chmura ()

American Economic Review, 2008, vol. 98, issue 3, pages 938-66

Abstract: Five stationary concepts for completely mixed 2 x 2-games are experimentally compared: Nash equilibrium, quantal response equilibrium, action-sampling equilibrium, payoff-sampling equilibrium (Martin J. Osborne and Ariel Rubinstein 1998), and impulse balance equilibrium. Experiments on 12 games, 6 constant sum games, and 6 nonconstant sum games were run with 12 independent subject groups for each constant sum game and 6 independent subject groups for each nonconstant sum game. Each independent subject group consisted of four players 1 and four players 2, interacting anonymously over 200 periods with random matching. The comparison of the five theories shows that the order of performance from best to worst is as follows: impulse balance equilibrium, payoff-sampling equilibrium, action-sampling equilibrium, quantal response equilibrium, Nash equilibrium.

Date: 2008
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1257/aer.98.3.938 (text/html)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php? ... &issue_date=June2008 (application/pdf)
http://www.e-aer.org/data/june08/20051147_data.zip dataset accompanying article (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members.

Related works:
Working Paper: Stationary Concepts for Experimental 2x2 Games (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:98:y:2008:i:3:p:938-66

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is edited by Robert Moffitt

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().