Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced?

Ian Parry () and Kenneth A. Small

American Economic Review, 2009, vol. 99, issue 3, pages 700-724

Abstract: This paper derives empirically tractable formulas for the welfare effects of fare adjustments in passenger peak and off-peak rail and bus transit, and for optimal pricing of those services. The formulas account for congestion, pollution, accident externalities, scale economies, and agency adjustment of transit service offerings. We apply them using parameter values for Washington (DC), Los Angeles, and London. The results support the efficiency of the large current fare subsidies; even starting with fares at 50 percent of operating costs, incremental fare reductions are welfare improving in almost all cases. These findings are robust to alternative assumptions and parameters. (JEL L92, R41, R42, R48)

Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1257/aer.99.3.700 (text/html)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.99.3.700 (application/pdf)
http://www.e-aer.org/data/june09/20070998_data.zip dataset accompanying article (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members.

Related works:
Working Paper: Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced? (2007)
Working Paper: Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:99:y:2009:i:3:p:700-724

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is edited by Robert Moffitt

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().