Incentives and Services for College Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial

Joshua Angrist (), Daniel Lang and Philip Oreopoulos ()

American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2009, vol. 1, issue 1, pages 136-63

Abstract: This paper reports on an experimental evaluation of strategies designed to improve academic performance among college freshmen. One treatment group was offered academic support services. Another was offered financial incentives for good grades. A third group combined both interventions. Service use was highest for women and for subjects in the combined group. The combined treatment also raised the grades and improved the academic standing of women. These differentials persisted through the end of second year, though incentives were given in the first year only. This suggests study skills among some treated women increased. In contrast, the program had no effect on men. (JEL I21, I28)

Date: 2009
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1257/app.1.1.136 (text/html)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.136 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members.

Related works:
Working Paper: Incentives and Services for College Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejapp:v:1:y:2009:i:1:p:136-63

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Journal: Applied Economics is edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics from American Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().