Sticking with Your Vote: Cognitive Dissonance and Political Attitudes

Sendhil Mullainathan () and Ebonya Washington

American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2009, vol. 1, issue 1, pages 86-111

Abstract: Cognitive dissonance theory predicts that the act of voting for a candidate leads to a more favorable opinion of the candidate in the future. We find support for the empirical relevance of cognitive dissonance to political attitudes. We examine the presidential opinion ratings of voting-age eligibles and ineligibles two years after the president's election. We find that eligibles show two to three times greater polarization of opinions than comparable ineligibles. We find smaller effects when we compare polarization in opinions of senators elected during high turnout presidential campaign years with senators elected during nonpresidential campaign years. (JEL D72)

Date: 2009
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1257/app.1.1.86 (text/html)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.86 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/data/2007-0018_data.zip dataset accompanying article (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejapp:v:1:y:2009:i:1:p:86-111

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Journal: Applied Economics is edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics from American Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().