A Cautionary Tale about the Use of Administrative Data: Evidence from Age of Marriage Laws

Rebecca M. Blank, Kerwin Kofi Charles and James M. Sallee

American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2009, vol. 1, issue 2, pages 128-49

Abstract: This paper demonstrates that administrative data may be inferior to survey data under particular circumstances. We examine the effect of state laws governing the minimum age of marriage in the United States. The estimated effects of these laws are much smaller when based on retrospective reports from census versus administrative records from Vital Statistics data. This discrepancy appears due to systematic avoidance behavior of two kinds. Some young people marry in states with less restrictive laws; others appear to have misrepresented their age on their marriage certificate. Our results have important implications regarding legal avoidance and the use of administrative data. (JEL J12 K36)

Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1257/app.1.2.128 (text/html)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.2.128 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2008-0014_data.zip dataset accompanying article (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejapp:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:128-49

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Journal: Applied Economics is edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics from American Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().