Sniping and Squatting in Auction Markets

Jeffrey C. Ely and Tanjim Hossain ()

American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2009, vol. 1, issue 2, pages 68-94

Abstract: We conducted a field experiment to test the benefit from late bidding (sniping) in online auction markets. We compared sniping to early bidding (squatting) in auctions for newly-released DVDs on eBay. Sniping led to a statistically significant increase in our average surplus. However, this improvement was small. The two bidding strategies resulted in a variety of other qualitative differences in the outcomes of auctions. We show that a model of multiple concurrent auctions, in which our opponents are naive or incremental bidders as identified in the lab, explain the results well. Our findings illustrate how the overall impact of naivete, and the benefit from sniping observed in the lab, may be substantially attenuated in real-world market settings. (JEL D44)

Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1257/mic.1.2.68 (text/html)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.1.2.68 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:68-94

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Journal: Microeconomics is edited by Andrew Postlewaite

More articles in American Economic Journal: Microeconomics from American Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().