The Good News-Bad News Effect: Asymmetric Processing of Objective Information about Yourself

David Eil and Justin M. Rao

American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2011, vol. 3, issue 2, pages 114-38

Abstract: We study processing and acquisition of objective information regarding qualities that people care about, intelligence and beauty. Subjects receiving negative feedback did not respect the strength of these signals, were far less predictable in their updating behavior and exhibited an aversion to new information. In response to good news, inference conformed more closely to Bayes' Rule, both in accuracy and precision. Signal direction did not affect updating or acquisition in our neutral control. Unlike past work, our design varied direction and agreement with priors independently. The results indicate that confirmation bias is driven by direction; confirmation alone had no effect. (JEL D82, D83)

JEL-codes: D82 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
Note: DOI: 10.1257/mic.3.2.114
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.114 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/data/2010-0077_data.zip (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:3:y:2011:i:2:p:114-38

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Journal: Microeconomics is edited by Andrew Postlewaite

More articles in American Economic Journal: Microeconomics from American Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Jane Voros ().