Modern Epistemology against Analytic Philosophy: A Reply

Deirdre N. McCloskey

Journal of Economic Literature, 1995, vol. 33, issue 3, pages 1319-1323

Abstract: Uskali Maki read three books by McCloskey on the "rhetoric of economics" with sympathy. But he wants McCloskey to choose between a coherence and a correspondence theory of truth. McCloskey notes in reply that modern epistemology - by contrast with the analytic philosophy circa 1955 that many philosophers of economics espouse - rejects the choice. Modern epistemology would say that economic scientists argue in many legitimate ways, governed by ethics. In brief, as Maki agrees, economics has a rhetoric. Rhetoric is a better guide than 1955-style analytic philosophy.

Date: 1995

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.e-jel.org/archive/sept1995/Mccloske.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:33:y:1995:i:3:p:1319-1323

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Literature is edited by Roger H. Gordon and John McMillan

More articles in Journal of Economic Literature from American Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().