A Review of David Colander

Daniel Hamermesh ()

Journal of Economic Literature, 2008, vol. 46, issue 2, pages 407-11

Abstract: David Colander's update/reworking of his 1987 volume draws conclusions about graduate study in economics from interviews with students in selected leading U.S. programs. Although not formally statistical, the interviews support the conclusion that most of the core of graduate instruction (except macro) is handled very well. Colander's concern about the lack of attention to training teachers is well founded. His conclusion that fewer idiots savants are being trained than in the 1980s is overly optimistic, and his worry about stresses that graduate students express is misplaced.

Date: 2008

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jeclit:v:46:y:2008:i:2:p:407-11

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Literature is edited by Roger H. Gordon and John McMillan

More articles in Journal of Economic Literature from American Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().