Do Forecasters Inform or Reassure? Evaluation of the German Real-Time Data
Konstantin Kholodilin () and
Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik), 2009, vol. 55, issue 4, pages 269-294
The paper evaluates the quality of the German national accounting data (GDP and its useside components) as measured by the magnitude and dispersion of the forecast / revision errors. It is demonstrated that government consumption series are the least reliable, whereas real GDP and real private consumption data are the most reliable. In addition, early forecasts of GDP, private consumption, and investment growth rates are shown to be systematically upward biased. Finally, early forecasts of all the variables seem to be no more accurate than naïve forecasts based on the historical mean of the final data.
Keywords: Quality of statistical data; real-time data; signal-to-noise ratio; forecasts; revisions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C53 C89 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Working Paper: Do Forecasters Inform or Reassure?: Evaluation of the German Real-Time Data (2009)
Working Paper: Do forecasters inform or reassure? Evaluation of the German real-time data (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: /RePEc:aeq:aeqaeq:v55_y2009_i4_q4_p269-294
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.duncker-h ... nomicsquarterly.html
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik) is currently edited by Ansgar Belke, Uwe Sunde and Winfried Koeniger
More articles in Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik) from Duncker & Humblot, Berlin
Series data maintained by Deborah Anne Bowen ().