The Transition from RDBMS to NoSQL. A Comparative Analysis of Three Popular Non-Relational Solutions: Cassandra, MongoDB and Couchbase
Cristina Băzăr () and
Cosmin Sebastian Iosif ()
Additional contact information
Cristina Băzăr: University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
Cosmin Sebastian Iosif: University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
Database Systems Journal, 2014, vol. 5, issue 2, pages 49-59
NoSQL databases were built in the need to deal with the increasing amount of complex data (Big Data), required in real-time web applications, and are mostly addressing some of these points: the focus on availability over consistency, horizontally scalable, distributed architecture, and open-source. The purpose of this paper is to present the reasons for a transition from RDBMS to NoSQL databases, to describe the main characteristics of non-relational databases and to compare and analyze three popular NoSQL solutions - Cassandra, MongoDB and CouchBase, outlining the results obtained during performance comparison tests. Each solution is optimized for different workloads and different use cases. Therefore, each has its own strong points and weaknesses.
Keywords: NoSQL; Relational vs NoSQL; comparison; Cassandra; MongoDB; Couchbase (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aes:dbjour:v:5:y:2014:i:2:p:49-59
Access Statistics for this article
Database Systems Journal is currently edited by Ion Lungu
More articles in Database Systems Journal from Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Adela Bara ().