EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Sensitivity of Technical Efficiency Estimates to Estimation Methods: An Empirical Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Approaches

Henry de-Graft Acquah

APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 2014, vol. 08, issue 1

Abstract: This paper highlights the sensitivity of technical efficiency estimates to estimation approaches using empirical data. Firm specific technical efficiency and mean technical efficiency are estimated using the non parametric Data Envelope Analysis (DEA) and the parametric Corrected Ordinary Least Squares (COLS) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) approaches. Mean technical efficiency is found to be sensitive to the choice of estimation technique. Analysis of variance and Tukey’s test suggests significant differences in means between efficiency scores from different methods. In general the DEA and SFA frontiers resulted in higher mean technical efficiency estimates than the COLS production frontier. The efficiency estimates of the DEA have the smallest variability when compared with the SFA and COLS. There exists a strong positive correlation between the efficiency estimates based on the three methods. Keywords:

Keywords: Technical Efficiency; Stochastic Frontier Analysis; Deterministic Frontier Analysis; Data Envelope Analysis; Tukey’s Test.; Research Methods/ Statistical Methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://purl.umn.edu/187530 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:apstra:187530

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce from AGRIMBA
Series data maintained by AgEcon Search ().

 
Page updated 2017-01-12
Handle: RePEc:ags:apstra:187530