Devil or Angel? The Role of Speculation in the Recent Commodity Price Boom (and Bust)

Scott H. Irwin, Dwight R. Sanders and Robert P. Merrin

Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2009, vol. 41, issue 02

Abstract: It is commonly asserted that speculative buying by index funds in commodity futures and over–the–counter derivatives markets created a ‘‘bubble’’ in commodity prices, with the result that prices, and crude oil prices, in particular, far exceeded fundamental values at the peak. The purpose of this paper is to show that the bubble argument simply does not withstand close scrutiny. Four main points are explored. First, the arguments of bubble proponents are conceptually flawed and reflect fundamental and basic misunderstandings of how commodity futures markets actually work. Second, a number of facts about the situation in commodity markets are inconsistent with the existence of a substantial bubble in commodity prices. Third, available statistical evidence does not indicate that positions for any group in commodity futures markets, including long–only index funds, consistently lead futures price changes. Fourth, there is a historical pattern of attacks upon speculation during periods of extreme market volatility.

Keywords: commodity; futures; index fund; market; speculation; Agribusiness; Demand and Price Analysis; Financial Economics; Marketing; Q11; Q13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://purl.umn.edu/53083 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:joaaec:53083

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics from Southern Agricultural Economics Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by AgEcon Search ().