SPATIAL FISHERY RIGHTS AND MARINE ZONING: A DISCUSSION WITH REFERERNCE TO MANAGEMENT OF MARINE RESOURCES IN NEW ENGLAND

Daniel S. Holland

Marine Resource Economics, 2004, vol. 19, issue 1

Abstract: The absence of property rights leads to dissipation of resource rents in fisheries. Economists have long recommended the assignment of property rights to the fishery as a means to internalize the stock externalities that lead to rent dissipation. However, there is less agreement and little research on the optimal nature of property rights for fisheries. Sole ownership of the fishery, while potentially efficient, is generally not politically acceptable. Individual transferable quota (ITQ) systems may fail to achieve an efficient outcome for a variety of reasons, many of which are related to spatial phenomena. Territorial user rights in fisheries (TURFs), also will generally fail to achieve efficient outcomes. This paper illustrates a number of cases where inefficiency may persist in a rights-based fishery management system. Some of the potential benefits and costs of territorial stock use rights in fisheries (T-SURFs) are discussed along with the role of marine zoning.

Keywords: Resource /Energy Economics and Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://purl.umn.edu/28098 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:mareec:28098

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Marine Resource Economics from Marine Resources Foundation
Series data maintained by AgEcon Search ().