EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Trade Liberalization, Poverty and Inequality Nexus: A Case Study of India

Rana Ejaz Ali Khan () and Nadia Bashir ()
Additional contact information
Nadia Bashir: Department of Economics,The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Asian Economic and Financial Review, 2011, vol. 1, issue 3, pages 114-119

Abstract: The paper attempted to see the relationship between trade liberalization and poverty and inequality in India. For trade liberalization, volume of trade as ratio of GDP, head count ratio for poverty and Gini-coefficient has been used for income inequality. The granger causality technique is applied to time series data for the years 1970-2009. The results indicate that trade has no significant effect on poverty and poverty has no effect on trade. However, trade has increased inequality in the short-run and inequality affected the trade in the long-run negatively. It partially contradicts the prediction of the Stolper- Samuelson theorem.

Keywords: India; Trade liberalization; Income distribution; Poverty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aessweb.com/download.php?id=1060 (application/pdf)
http://www.aessweb.com/archives.php?m=September&id=1060 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:asi:aeafrj:2011:p:114-119

Access Statistics for this article

Asian Economic and Financial Review is edited by Qazi Muhammad Adnan Hye

More articles in Asian Economic and Financial Review from Asian Economic and Social Society
Address: Sadeeq Block, Near Fawara Chowk, Abbasia Town, Rahim Yar Khan - 64200, Punjab, Pakistan
Series data maintained by Qazi Muhammad Imran ().

 
Page updated 2013-04-01
Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:2011:p:114-119