Investigating possession of human blood as a property in Iran’s law with regard to legal and Islamic jurisprudential commentaries on organ transplant
Mohsen Dorrani () and
Abbas Taghvaee ()
Additional contact information
Mohsen Dorrani: Department of Law, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran
Abbas Taghvaee: Department of Islamic Teachings, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran
Juridical Tribune (Tribuna Juridica), 2016, vol. 6, issue 2, pages 376-383
A question that most of jurists are faced with is, whether human blood is basically a property or not and is human the owner of his blood? Moreover, what is the difference between blood and other organs of the body from the viewpoint of ownership? If blood is a property, why human is not the owner? Unlike blood, there have been legal discussions on organ sale, where blood can be retrieved by the body while segregated organs are not retrievable by the body. Investigating various views about ownership of organs of the body, one can conclude that blood is a property owned by humans.
Keywords: organ transplant; human blood; property; possession; proprietorship of blood. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K11 K32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:asr:journl:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:376-383
Access Statistics for this article
Juridical Tribune (Tribuna Juridica) is currently edited by December
More articles in Juridical Tribune (Tribuna Juridica) from Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Law Department Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Catalin-Silviu Sararu ().