Less Choice is Better, Sometimes

Bailey Norwood ()

Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 2006, vol. 4, issue 1, pages 1130-1130

Abstract: Psychological experiments have revealed that more choice does not always make one better off. For example, consumers are sometimes more likely to purchase a product from a small variety than a large variety. Some have suggested that this excessive-choice effect may have implications for how well markets serve society. This paper constructs an economic model where the excessive-choice effect results from search costs. The model shows that it is possible for markets to produce too much variety, but there are also incentives inducing markets to provide an optimal variety. Advertising, retailer market power, and slotting fees are not just signs of imperfect competition, but mechanisms of ensuring consumers are presented with an ideal choice set.

Keywords: variety; choice; retailing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: oai:bepress:jafio-1130
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1130&context=jafio (application/pdf)
Subscription to the journal may be required to access full texts.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.bepress.com/subscriptions.html

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization from Berkeley Electronic Press
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().