Measuring moral judgement and the implications of cooperative education and rule-based learning

Steven Dellaportas, Barry J. Cooper and Philomena Leung

Accounting and Finance, 2006, vol. 46, issue 1, pages 53-70

Abstract: The Defining Issues Test (DIT), developed by Rest (1986), measures a person's level of moral development using hypothetical social dilemmas. Although the DIT is useful for measuring moral development in social settings, it might not adequately capture an individual's moral judgement abilities in solving work-related problems (Weber, 1990; Trevino, 1992; Welton "et al.", 1994). In the present study, the moral judgement levels of 97 accounting students were measured over a 1 year period using two separate test instruments, the DIT and a context-specific instrument developed by Welton "et al." (1994). The test scores are significantly higher on the DIT than the Welton instrument (between the instruments and over time), suggesting that accounting students use higher levels of moral reasoning in resolving hypothetical social dilemmas and lower levels of moral reasoning in resolving context-specific dilemmas. The difference in test scores was highest during cooperative education (work placement programme), implying that the environment is a significant determinant on students' test scores. Copyright The Authors
Journal compilation (c) 2006 AFAANZ.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell ... 67-629X.2006.00161.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0810-5391

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting and Finance is edited by Robert Faff

More articles in Accounting and Finance from Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().