Capitalized intangibles and financial analysts

Zoltan Matolcsy and Anne Wyatt

Accounting and Finance, 2006, vol. 46, issue 3, pages 457-479

Abstract: We examine whether firms that capitalize a higher proportion of their underlying intangible assets have higher analyst following, lower dispersion of analysts' earnings forecasts and more accurate earnings forecasts relative to firms that capitalize a lower proportion. Under Australian generally accepted accounting principles, capitalization of intangible assets has become increasingly 'routine' since the late 1980s. It is predicted that this experience leads Australian analysts to expect firms with relatively more certain intangible investments to signal this fact by capitalizing intangible assets. Our results are consistent with this. We find that capitalization of intangible assets is associated with higher analyst following and lower absolute earnings forecast error for firms with a stock of underlying intangible assets. Our tests suggest a weaker association between capitalization and lower earnings forecast dispersion. We conclude that there are benefits for analysts, for management to have the option to capitalize intangible assets. These findings suggest that IAS 38 "Intangible Assets" and AASB 138 "Intangible Assets" reduce the usefulness of financial statements. Copyright (c) The Authors
Journal compilation (c) 2006 AFAANZ.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell ... 67-629X.2006.00177.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0810-5391

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting and Finance is edited by Robert Faff

More articles in Accounting and Finance from Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().