Is the audit services market competitive following Arthur Andersen's collapse?

Jane Hamilton, Yang Li and Donald Stokes

Accounting and Finance, 2008, vol. 48, issue 2, pages 233-258

Abstract: This study investigates whether audit markets remain competitive in the wake of Arthur Andersen's demise and merger with Ernst & Young to create the Big Four. We conduct the study estimating audit fee models using Australian audit market data from both 2000 and 2003 to determine whether there is any evidence of cartel pricing either before, or subsequent to, the merger. In both years, we find evidence of a Big N price premium when estimating an audit fee model across all clients, and when we estimate the model separately across large and small client market segments. This evidence is consistent with product differentiation by Big N auditors and competitive markets. Copyright (c) 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation (c) 2008 AFAANZ.

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00242.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:48:y:2008:i:2:p:233-258

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0810-5391

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting and Finance is edited by Robert Faff

More articles in Accounting and Finance from Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().