Knowledge transfer in project reviews: the effect of self-justification bias and moral hazard

Mandy M. Cheng, Axel K-D Schulz and Peter Booth

Accounting and Finance, 2009, vol. 49, issue 1, pages 75-93

Abstract: In this study, we examine two factors that impact managers' willingness to share private information during the project review stage of capital budgeting. Drawing on the cognitive dissonance theory and the agency theory, we find that both high perceived personal responsibility and the use of project reviews for performance evaluation result in a greater tendency for managers to withhold negative private information. However, we do not find an interaction between these two factors. Our study makes a contribution to both the academic literature investigating factors affecting project reviews and the practitioner literature looking at design and implementation of effective project reviews. Copyright (c) The Authors. Journal compilation (c) 2009 AFAANZ.

Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2008.00271.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:49:y:2009:i:1:p:75-93

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0810-5391

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting and Finance is edited by Robert Faff

More articles in Accounting and Finance from Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().