Consistent poverty comparisons and inferenceChanning Arndt and Kenneth Simler Agricultural Economics, 2007, vol. 37, issue 2-3, pages 133-139 Abstract: Building upon the cost of basic needs (CBN) approach, an integrated approach to making consumption-based poverty comparisons is presented. This approach contains two principal modifications to the standard CBN approach. The first permits the development of multiple poverty bundles that are utility consistent. The second recognizes that the poverty line itself is a random variable whose variation influences the degree of confidence in poverty measures. We illustrate the empirical importance of these two methodological changes for the case of Mozambique. With utility consistency imposed, estimated poverty rates tend to be systematically higher in rural areas and lower in urban areas. We also find that the true confidence intervals on the poverty estimates-those incorporating poverty line variance-tend to be considerably larger than those that ignore poverty line variance. Finally, we show that these two methodological changes interact. Specifically, we find that imposing utility consistency on poverty bundles tends to tighten confidence intervals, sometimes dramatically, on provincial poverty estimates. We conclude that this revised approach represents an important advance in poverty analysis. The revised approach is straightforward and directly applicable in empirical work. Copyright 2007 International Association of Agricultural Economists. Downloads: (external link) Related works: Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Agricultural Economics is edited by W.A. Masters and G.E. Shively More articles in Agricultural Economics from International Association of Agricultural Economists |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
Econpapers is hosted by the
Swedish Business School at Örebro University.