Would You Choose Your Preferred Option? Comparing Choice and Recoded Ranking Experiments

Alejandro Caparrós, José L. Oviedo and Pablo Campos

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2008, vol. 90, issue 3, pages 843-855

Abstract: Previous research has shown that results from a choice experiment are statistically different from those obtained from a ranking experiment that is recoded and treated as a choice experiment using only the first rank. By avoiding some of the shortcomings of previous comparisons, we obtain the opposite results using data from the valuation of a cork oak reforestation program in the south of Spain. Structural models and welfare estimations are statistically indistinguishable irrespective of the use of parametric or bootstrapping tests. Further, we employ follow-up questions and subsample analysis to test whether divergences appear when potential effects are isolated. Copyright Copyright 2008 American Agricultural Economics Association.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell ... &year=2008&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0002-9092

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Agricultural Economics is edited by Peter Berck, Robert J. Myers, Ian M. Sheldon and B. Wade Brorsen

More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from American Agricultural Economics Association
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().