How Closely Do Hypothetical Surveys and Laboratory Experiments Predict Field Behavior?

Jae Bong Chang, Jayson L. Lusk () and F. Bailey Norwood

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2009, vol. 91, issue 2, pages 518-534

Abstract: We compare the ability of three preference elicitation methods (hypothetical choices, nonhypothetical choices, and nonhypothetical rankings) and three discrete-choice econometric models (the multinomial logit [MNL], the independent availability logit [IAL], and the random parameter logit [RPL]) to predict actual retail shopping behavior in three different product categories (ground beef, wheat flour, and dishwashing liquid). Overall, we find a high level of external validity. Our specific results suggest that the nonhypothetical elicitation approaches, especially the nonhypothetical ranking method, outperformed the hypothetical choice experiment in predicting retail sales. We also find that the RPL can have superior predictive performance, but that the MNL predicts equally well in some circumstances. Copyright Copyright 2009 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... &year=2009&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ajagec:v:91:y:2009:i:2:p:518-534

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0002-9092

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Agricultural Economics is edited by Peter Berck, Robert J. Myers, Ian M. Sheldon and B. Wade Brorsen

More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from American Agricultural Economics Association
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().