Selling Australia as 'clean and green' *

Hui-Shung (Christie) Chang and Paul Kristiansen

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2006, vol. 50, issue 1, pages 103-113

Abstract: 'Clean and green' has been used as a marketing tool by Australian governments to promote agricultural products overseas. But how valid are these claims? Is the 'clean and green' image campaign effective? And should government be involved? We conclude that Australia may have had a 'clean and green' image in some markets, but in the future, concrete proof of environmental and quality credentials will be required to satisfy increasingly better-informed and more demanding customers. We argue that governments cannot, and should not, continue to promote Australian products based on an undefined 'clean and green' image. Rather, more resources should be directed to the development, promotion and wide adoption of integrated, credible and well-defined environmental management and quality assurance systems if Australia is to compete effectively in export markets, especially in the longer term. Copyright Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc. and Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2006.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell ... &year=2006&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1364-985X

Access Statistics for this article

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics is edited by Tom Kompas, Jeff Bennett and Quentin Grafton

More articles in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics from Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().