WHY DID ECONOMIC MODELS FALSELY PREDICT A BUSH LANDSLIDE IN 1992?

Stephen E. Haynes and Joe A. Stone ()

Contemporary Economic Policy, 1994, vol. 12, issue 2, pages 123-130

Abstract: Most economic models falsely predicted a landslide victory for former President Bush in 1992. Rather than winning by the predicted margin of eight to 12 percentage points, Bush lost by a margin of about four. Exit polls tend to eliminate the unique candidacy of Ross Perot as an explanation for the turnabout. This paper examines three factors: (i) changes in the proportion of the population in the military (a proxy for national security concerns), (ii) the number of consecutive terms of incumbency, and (iii) nonlinear interactions between the military variable and standard economic variables. Including these factors in an economic model of the 1992 presidential race avoids predictions of a landslide victory for Bush and also improves the model's overall power and stability. Copyright 1994 Western Economic Association International.

Date: 1994
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1994.tb00428.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:12:y:1994:i:2:p:123-130

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1074-3529

Access Statistics for this article

Contemporary Economic Policy is edited by Wade E. Martin

More articles in Contemporary Economic Policy from Western Economic Association International
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().