AVERTING AND INSURANCE DECISIONS IN THE WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE: IMPLICATIONS OF SURVEY AND EXPERIMENTAL DATA FOR WILDFIRE RISK REDUCTION POLICY

John Talberth, Robert P. Berrens, Michael McKee and Michael Jones

Contemporary Economic Policy, 2006, vol. 24, issue 2, pages 203-223

Abstract: When confronted by catastrophic wildfire risk, homeowners simultaneously allocate resources between insurance and averting activities. Expected utility theory suggests that complete insurance coverage precludes investment in averting activities. However, when potential losses include a significant nonmarket component, optimal choice includes both. To investigate this issue, the authors analyze a unique combination of contingent valuation and experimental data. Both settings include a split-sample treatment to test the influence of wildfire risk zone information. The authors find that amenity values, subjective risk, averting efficacy perception, and demographic factors influence both willingness to pay and averting share and that risk information has the predicted ordering effect. (JEL "C9", "Q51", "Q54") Copyright 2006 Western Economic Association International.

Date: 2006
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1093/cep-byj021 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:24:y:2006:i:2:p:203-223

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1074-3529

Access Statistics for this article

Contemporary Economic Policy is edited by Wade E. Martin

More articles in Contemporary Economic Policy from Western Economic Association International
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().