EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CONSERVATION PROGRAMS: THE HOOD RIVER EXPERIMENT

Muhannad Khawaja, Thomas R Potiowsky and H. Gil Peach

Contemporary Economic Policy, 1990, vol. 8, issue 3, pages 174-184

Abstract: Economic cost-effectiveness analysis is a systematic approach to assessing benefits and costs associated with different actions. This analysis, as applied to energy conservation programs, is complicated greatly by the existence of intangible benefits and costs. A further complication occurs when the input values are uncertain. Such inputs include the useful lives of measures installed, the appropriate discount rate, and the expected levels of savings. This paper shows how one can incorporate input uncertainty and some intangibles into the cost-effectiveness analysis calculations. The Hood River Conservation Experiment provides the framework for analyzing these issues and serves as a pilot program for future conservation implementation. Copyright 1990 Western Economic Association International.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1990.tb00652.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:8:y:1990:i:3:p:174-184

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1074-3529

Access Statistics for this article

Contemporary Economic Policy is edited by Brad R. Humphreys

More articles in Contemporary Economic Policy from Western Economic Association International
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().

 
Page updated 2012-03-12
Handle: RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:8:y:1990:i:3:p:174-184