Why Have Some Indian States Done Better Than Others at Reducing Rural Poverty?

Gaurav Datt () and Martin Ravallion ()

Economica, 1998, vol. 65, issue 257, pages 17-38

Abstract: Rural poverty rankings of Indian states in 1990 were very different from those of 1960. This unevenness in progress allows us to study the causes of poverty in a developing rural economy. The authors model the evolution of various poverty measures using pooled state-level data for the period 1957-91. Differences in trend rates of poverty reduction are attributed to differing growth rates of farm yield per acre and differing initial conditions; states starting with better infrastructure and human resources saw significantly higher long-term rates of poverty reduction. Deviations from trend are attributed to inflation, which hurt the poor in the short term, and shocks to farm and nonfarm output. Copyright 1998 by The London School of Economics and Political Science

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (83) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... =257&year=&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Why have some Indian states done better than others at reducing rural poverty? (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:econom:v:65:y:1998:i:257:p:17-38

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0013-0427

Access Statistics for this article

Economica is edited by Frank Cowell, Tore Ellingsen and Alan Manning

More articles in Economica from London School of Economics and Political Science
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().