Can budget institutions counteract political indiscipline?

Stefania Fabrizio and Ashoka Mody

Economic Policy, 2006, vol. 21, issue 48, pages 689-739

Abstract: "The budget is an expression of political rather than economic priorities. We confirm this proposition for a group of new and potential members of the European Union, finding that politics dominates. The contemporary practice of democracy can increase budget deficits through not only ideological preferences, but also more fragmented government coalitions and higher voter participation. Long-term structural forces, triggered by societal divisions and representative electoral rules, have more ambiguous implications but also appear to increase budget pressures, as others have also found. However, our most robust, and hopeful, finding is that budget institutions - mechanisms and rules of the budget process - that create checks and balances have significant value in curbing fiscal pressures even when the politics is representative but undisciplined, and when long-term structural forces are unfavourable." Copyright CEPR, CES, MSH, 2006.

View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell ... 68-0327.2006.00169.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0266-4658

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Policy is edited by Giuseppe Bertola, Philippe Martin and Paul Seabright

More articles in Economic Policy from CEPR, CES, MSH
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().