THE STATE OF U.S. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: WHAT'S RIGHT AND WHAT'S WRONG?
Bengt Holmstrom () and
Steven Kaplan ()
Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2003, vol. 15, issue 3, pages 8-20
Largely as a result of failures at Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, and other prominent American companies, U.S. corporate governance practices have come under attack. These much publicized failures and the resulting popular outcry have served as catalysts for legislative and regulatory changes that include the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and new governance guidelines from the NYSE and NASDAQ. But is the U.S. corporate governance system really as bad as critics suggest? And will the recent legislative and regulatory changes lead to a more effective system? 2003 Morgan Stanley.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (30) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2003.tb00457.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: The State of U.S. Corporate Governance: What's Right and What's Wrong? (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:15:y:2003:i:3:p:8-20
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1078-1196
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Applied Corporate Finance is currently edited by Donald H. Chew Jr.
More articles in Journal of Applied Corporate Finance from Morgan Stanley
Series data maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().