Value versus Growth: The International Evidence

Eugene F. Fama () and Kenneth French ()

Journal of Finance, 1998, vol. 53, issue 6, pages 1975-1999

Abstract: Value stocks have higher returns than growth stocks in markets around the world. For the period 1975 through 1995, the difference between the average returns on global portfolios of high and low book-to-market stocks is 7.68 percent per year, and value stocks outperform growth stocks in twelve of thirteen major markets. An international capital asset pricing model cannot explain the value premium, but a two-factor model that includes a risk factor for relative distress captures the value premium in international returns. Copyright The American Finance Association 1998.

Date: 1998
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... &year=1998&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Value Versus Growth: The International Evidence
Working Paper: Value versus Growth: The International Evidence
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:53:y:1998:i:6:p:1975-1999

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Finance is edited by Robert F. Stambaugh

More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().