Near-sighted Justice

Dan Bernhardt () and Ed Nosal

Journal of Finance, 2004, vol. 59, issue 6, pages 2655-2684

Abstract: Chapter 11 structures complex negotiations between creditors and debtors that are overseen by a bankruptcy court. We identify conditions where the court should sometimes err in determining which firms should be liquidated. Such errors affect actions by both good and bad entrepreneurs. We first characterize the optimal error rate without renegotiation. When creditors and debtors can renegotiate to circumvent an error-riven court, for one class of actions a "blind" court that ignores all information is optimal. For another class, the court should place the burden of proof on the entrepreneur. The robust feature is that the court should sometimes err. Copyright 2004 by The American Finance Association.

Date: 2004
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... &year=2004&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Nearsighted justice (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:59:y:2004:i:6:p:2655-2684

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Finance is edited by Robert F. Stambaugh

More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().