Monopoly in the UK: What Determines Whether the MMC Finds against the Investigated Firms?

Stephen W Davies, Nigel L. Driffield () and Roger Clarke

Journal of Industrial Economics, 1999, vol. 47, issue 3, pages 263-83

Abstract: This paper draws on data from 73 UK Monopolies and Mergers Commission reports on monopoly between 1973 and 1995. It shows that there is a roughly two in three chance that the Commission will come to an adverse conclusion against the investigated firms in a given case. 75-80% of decisions can be explained purely in terms of the market share of the leading firm and knowledge of the broad nature of the alleged anti-competitive practice. An adverse finding is most likely in cases involving exclusive dealing, and least likely where other vertical restraints are involved. Copyright 1999 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Date: 1999
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... &year=1999&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Monopoly in the UK: What Determines whether the MMC finds against the Investigated Firms? (1998)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jindec:v:47:y:1999:i:3:p:263-83

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0022-1821

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Industrial Economics is edited by Pierre Regibeau, Yeon-Koo Che, Kenneth Corts, Thomas Hubbard, Patrick Legros and Frank Verboven

More articles in Journal of Industrial Economics from Blackwell Publishing
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().