Modelling non-response in the National Child Development Study

Denise Hawkes and Ian Plewis

Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society Series A, 2006, vol. 169, issue 3, pages 479-491

Abstract: There is widespread concern that the cumulative effects of the non-response that is bound to affect any long-running longitudinal study will lead to mistaken inferences about change. We focus on the National Child Development Study and show how non-response has accumulated over time. We distinguish between attrition and wave non-response and show how these two kinds of non-response can be related to a set of explanatory variables. We model the discrete time hazard of non-response and also fit a set of multinomial logistic regressions to the probabilities of different kinds of non-response at a particular sweep. We find that the best predictors of non-response at any sweep are generally variables that are measured at the previous sweep but, although non-response is systematic, much of the variation in it remains unexplained by our models. We consider the implications of our results for both design and analysis. Copyright 2006 Royal Statistical Society.

Date: 2006
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00401.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:169:y:2006:i:3:p:479-491

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0964-1998

Access Statistics for this article

Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society Series A is edited by A. Fielding and G. Verbeke

More articles in Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society Series A from Royal Statistical Society
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().