Why Are Managed Care Plans Less Expensive: Risk Selection, Utilization, or Reimbursement?

Daniel Polsky and Sean Nicholson

Journal of Risk & Insurance, 2004, vol. 71, issue 1, pages 21-40

Abstract: This article develops a new method of decomposing the cost difference between HMO and non-HMO plans into observed risk selection, unobserved risk selection, utilization differences, and differences in provider reimbursement rates. We implement this method using a large national sample of employer-sponsored health insurance enrollees from the Community Tracking Study Household Survey. We find no evidence that HMO plans attract a disproportionate share of low-risk enrollees; the US$188 difference between HMO and non-HMO medical expenditures per enrollee can be explained by the relatively low provider reimbursement rates paid by HMO plans. This indicates there may be little need for employers to risk adjust insurance premiums or otherwise restrict employee choice of plan types. Copyright The Journal of Risk and Insurance.

Date: 2004
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0022-4367.2004.00077.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:71:y:2004:i:1:p:21-40

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0022-4367

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Risk & Insurance is edited by Georges Dionne

More articles in Journal of Risk & Insurance from The American Risk and Insurance Association
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().