Is the Welfare State Self-Destructive? A Study of Government Benefit Morale

Friedrich Heinemann ()

Kyklos, 2008, vol. 61, issue 2, pages 237-257

Abstract: The concern that generous welfare state institutions may in the long-run undermine social norms which limit the disincentives of social security systems is as old as the welfare state itself. Already in the 1930s, Franklin D. Roosevelt warned of the 'moral disintegration' effect of welfare dependency. This study assesses the empirical validity of this concern. Based on the results of four waves of the World Value Surveys the individual and country-specific determinants of benefit morale - defined as the reluctance to claim government benefits without legal entitlement - are analysed. The results support the empirical relevance of these worries: In the long-run an increase of government benefits and unemployment is associated with deteriorating welfare state ethics. Copyright 2008 The Authors.

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2008.00400.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Is the Welfare State Self-destructive? A Study of Government Benefit Morale (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:61:y:2008:i:2:p:237-257

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0023-5962

Access Statistics for this article

Kyklos is edited by Rene L. Frey

More articles in Kyklos from Blackwell Publishing
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().