Bounding a Matching Estimator: The Case of a Norwegian Training Program

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2001, vol. 63, issue 1, pages 115-43

Abstract: In this paper we evaluate a Norwegian vocational training rehabilitation program by comparing employment outcomes of trainees and nonparticipants using nonexperimental data. A matching estimator is used to calculate the training effect for different subgroups of the sample. We demonstrate how bounding the matching estimator can be used to evaluate the intrinsic uncertainty of estimated training effects due to selection on unobserved individual characteristics. After adjustment for observed selection into training programs we find that the overall training effect is around six percentage points. This is mainly due to a high and significant effect for individuals with a low probability of program participation. After calculating upper and lower bounds on the test statistics used to test the hypothesis of no training effect we find that the overall effect is sensitive to unobserved selection. However, the result that the training effect is positive for individuals who are less likely to participate in a training program is not sensitive to selection bias. These individuals also have the lowest employment probabilities, which indicates potential harmful cream skimming in the Norwegian vocational rehabilitation sector.Copyright 2001 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Date: 2001

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... &year=2001&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Bounding a Matching Estimator: The Case of a Norwegian Training Program (2001)
Working Paper: Bounding a Marching Estimator: the Case of a Norwegian Training Program (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0305-9049

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics is edited by Christopher Adam, Anindya Banerjee, Christopher Bowdler, Gavin Cameron, David Hendry, Adriaan Kalwij, John Knight and Jonathan Temple

More articles in Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics from Department of Economics, University of Oxford
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().