Rules of proof, courts, and incentives

Dominique Demougin and Claude Fluet

RAND Journal of Economics, 2008, vol. 39, issue 1, pages 20-40

Abstract: We analyze the design of legal principles and procedures for court decision making in civil litigation. The objective is the provision of incentives for potential tort-feasors to exert care when evidence is imperfect and may be distorted by the parties. Efficiency is consistent with courts adjudicating on the basis of the preponderance of evidence standard together with common law exclusionary rules. Inefficient equilibria may nevertheless also arise under these rules. Burden of proof guidelines are then useful as a coordination device. Alternatively, guidelines are unnecessary if courts are allowed a more active or inquisitorial role in contrast to that of passive adjudicator. Copyright (c)2008, RAND.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell ... 41-6261.2008.00002.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0741-6261

Access Statistics for this article

RAND Journal of Economics is edited by James Hosek

More articles in RAND Journal of Economics from RAND Corporation
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().