Import Protection Bias

Paul Pecorino ()

Review of International Economics, 2008, vol. 16, issue 2, pages 341-349

Abstract: Rodrik (1995) notes that trade regimes tend to be biased towards import protection, while the standard political economy models either yield no prediction on the bias of the trade regime or predict, counterfactually, a bias towards the export sector. This constitutes an important shortcoming in the political economy of trade literature. In this paper, the Grossman and Helpman (1994) "Protection for Sale" model is extended by adding government expenditure. This expenditure may be financed via a combination of tariff revenue and a distorting wage tax. In addition to the government expenditure, export subsidies need to be financed either via tariff revenue or a distorting wage tax. With this addition, plausible values of the model's parameters yield import protection bias. Copyright © 2007 The Author.

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1111 ... .00717.x/enhancedabs link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0965-7576

Access Statistics for this article

Review of International Economics is edited by E. Kwan Choi

More articles in Review of International Economics from Blackwell Publishing
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().