Using Placebo Laws to Test “More Guns, Less Crime”

Eric Helland and Alexander Tabarrok ()
Additional contact information
Eric Helland: Claremont-McKenna College

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2004, vol. advances.4, issue 1

Abstract: We reexamine Mustard and Lott’s controversial study on the effect of “shall-issue” gun laws on crime using an empirical standard error function randomly generated from “placebo” laws. We find that the effect of shall-issue laws on crime is much less well-estimated than the Mustard and Lott (1997) and Lott (2000) results suggest. We also find, however, that the cross equation restrictions implied by the Lott-Mustard theory are supported. A boomlet has occurred in recent years in the use of quasi-natural experiments to answer important questions of public policy. The intuitive power of this approach, however, has sometimes diverted attention from the statistical assumptions that must be made, particularly regarding standard errors. Failing to take into account serial correlation and grouped data can dramatically reduce standard errors suggesting greater certainty in effects than is actually the case. We find that the placebo law technique (Bertrand, Duflo and Mullainathan 2002) is a useful addition to the econometrician’s toolkit.

Keywords: guns; crime; placebo laws (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K14 C15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1182&context=bejeap (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:advances.4:y:2004:i:1:n:1

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy from Berkeley Electronic Press
Series data maintained by Avi Warner ().