If It Were a Fight, They Would Have Stopped It in December of 2008
Barbera Robert J
The Economists' Voice, 2010, vol. 7, issue 2, pages 1-4
New classical economics should not be judged based upon what theorists say today about the 2008-2009 crisis, but instead by looking at what economists like Casey Mulligan said as the crisis was unfolding. Once scrutiny is given to what new classical economics lead adherents believe in late 2008, Robert Barbera wonders how any rational thinker could continue to defend the framework.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ev.2010.7.2/ev.20 ... .1725.xml?format=INT (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:evoice:v:7:y:2010:i:2:n:3
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
The Economists' Voice is currently edited by Michael Cragg, Dwight Jaffee and Joseph Stiglitz
More articles in The Economists' Voice from De Gruyter
Series data maintained by Peter Golla ().