The Relative Importance of Strength and Weight in Processing New Information in the College Football Betting Market

Greg Durham and Mukunthan Santhanakrishnan

Journal of Prediction Markets, 2008, vol. 2, issue 2, pages 13-28

Abstract: Griffin and Tversky (1992) suggest that individuals, when formulating posterior probabilities based on the available evidence, tend to overreact to a new piece of evidence's strength while underreacting to the relative importance of its weight. We test this prediction using the college football betting market, a market that is commonly employed in tests for efficiency and rationality. Using average points in excess of the spread and streak against the spread as measures for strength and weight, respectively, we find that bettors overreact to strength and underreact to weight. These results are consistent with the predictions of Griffin and Tversky, as well as with the findings of Sorescu and Subrahmanyam (2006) and Barberis, Shleifer, and Vishny (1998) in financial market settings. Our work also provides insight into how behavioral biases might affect price-formation processes in other markets.

JEL-codes: L83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ubpl/jpm/2008/00000002/00000002/art00002 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:buc:jpredm:v:2:y:2008:i:2:p:13-28

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.predictio ... ex_files/Page418.htm

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Prediction Markets is edited by Nottingham Business School Leighton Vaughan Williams

More articles in Journal of Prediction Markets from University of Buckingham Press
Series data maintained by Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross ().