Ought Ain’t Is: Midnight Thoughts On Education

Brussels Economic Review/Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles, 2004, vol. 47, issue 3-4, pages 321-340

Abstract: Arguably nothing is more important to long-run improvement in human well being than a high quality basic education for every child. Promoting the achievement of this goal requires a serviceable positive model of education policies—a coherent causal explanation of why governments actually do what they do. This paper is part of a series of three papers that creates a theoretical framework for educational policy in developing countries. Here I show that “normative as positive” (NAP)-- explaining that the policies actually chosen were chosen because they maximize an individualized social welfare function--fails as a useful general positive model of schooling. While NAP can perhaps accommodate the fact of some direct production of schooling by some governments, the reality is that (nearly) all governments produce education and that, by and large, this is their only support to education. Moreover, NAP fails not just in the large but also the small: there are six additional common facts about educational policies inconsistent with NAP.

Keywords: education; policy; development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H52 I28 O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

Brussels Economic Review/Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles is edited by Michele Cincera

More articles in Brussels Economic Review/Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles from Editions du DULBEA, Université libre de Bruxelles, Department of Applied Economics (DULBEA)
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Michele Cincera ().