Economics at your fingertips  

The pros and cons of higher transparency: the case of speculative attacks

Jean-Pierre Allegret () and Camille Cornand

Recherches économiques de Louvain, 2006, vol. 72, issue 3, pages 215-246

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to evaluate to what extent more transparency can reduce the occurrence of speculative attacks. It proposes a survey of the literature about the pros and cons of transparency on the exchange rate market, which is one of the main pillars of the new international financial architecture. The effects of transparency are shown to be ambiguous both from a theoretical and empirical point of views. However, the imperfect connection resulting from the confrontation between theory and empirics suggests that some new insights are necessary in order to better catch stylised facts on the one hand and to better evaluate the theory on the other, as has been done in recent literature. This leads to new proposals for economic and informational policies.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf) ... -2006-3-page-215.htm (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: The pros and cons of higher transparency: the case of speculative attacks (2006) Downloads
Working Paper: The Pros and Cons of Higher Transparency: The Case of Speculative Attacks (2005) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: /RePEc:cai:reldbu:rel_723_0215

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Recherches économiques de Louvain from De Boeck Université
Series data maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire ().

Page updated 2015-02-01
Handle: RePEc:cai:reldbu:rel_723_0215