Clickers, Student Engagement and Performance in an Introductory Economics Course: a Cautionary Tale
Marianne Johnson () and
Denise Robson ()
Additional contact information Marianne Johnson: University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
Denise Robson: University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
Abstract:
We examine whether clickers affect learning in an introductory economics course when introduced on a limited 'quizzing' basis in a traditional lecture course. Based on early and end of semester surveys, we assess whether clickers are associated with changes in student course performance or changes in student engagement. Using an education production function that controls for student GPA, etc., we find no significant differences between the clicker and nonclicker sections in student attitudes toward attendance, participation or class engagement, nor do we find any difference in exam performance. We conclude instructors should be cautious patching new technologies into traditional lecture courses, and universities cautious in mandating technology use.
Computers in Higher Education Economics Review is edited by W. David McCausland
More articles in Computers in Higher Education Economics Review from Economics Network, University of Bristol Address: University of Bristol, BS8 1HH, United Kingdom Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Martin Poulter ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .