Retirement Incentives Contained in Occupational Pension Plans and Their Implications for the Mandatory Retirement Debate

James Pesando and Morley Gunderson ()

Canadian Journal of Economics, 1988, vol. 21, issue 2, pages 244-64

Abstract: The authors find, for the most prevalent type of pension plan in Canada, that plan provisions are not a close substitute for mandatory retirement. Special retirement provis ions, which have a strong potential to discourage work, typically do not come into play before age sixty and are far from universal. The p ostponed retirement provision that has the greatest potential to disc ourage work beyond age sixty-five has been deemed an unacceptable sub stitute for mandatory retirement in those jurisdictions (Quebec, Mani toba, Government of Canada) which have banned mandatory retirement.

Date: 1988
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0008-4085%2819880 ... ICIOP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-N (text/html)
only available to JSTOR subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cje:issued:v:21:y:1988:i:2:p:244-64

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://economics.ca/en/membership.php

Access Statistics for this article

Canadian Journal of Economics is edited by David Green

More articles in Canadian Journal of Economics from Canadian Economics Association
Address: Canadian Economics Association Prof. Steven Ambler, Secretary-Treasurer c/o Olivier Lebert, CEA/CJE/CPP Office C.P. 35006, 1221 Fleury Est Montréal, Québec, Canada H2C 3K4
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Prof. Werner Antweiler ().