A discipline without sympathy: the happiness of the majority and its demise

Sandra Peart and David M. Levy

Canadian Journal of Economics, 2005, vol. 38, issue 3, pages 937-954

Abstract: Experimental economists frequently invoke Adam Smith's notion of sympathy, and experimental treatments typically examine sympathy in situations where two groups are involved. We explore additional implications of sympathy suggested by the work of later classical economists. We link the notion of sympathy to their majoritarian welfare analysis. Since sympathy provides a source of moral obligation, classical economists held that agents in democratic politics will refrain from unjust acts. We also consider how sympathetic agents may effect reforms that involve more than two parties, in which the benefits from the action accrue to someone who is not part of the `exchange.'

JEL-codes: B12 D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005

Downloads: (external link)
http://economics.ca/cgi/xms?jab=v38n3/13.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Available to subscribers only. Alternative access through JSTOR and Ingenta.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cje:issued:v:38:y:2005:i:3:p:937-954

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://economics.ca/en/membership.php

Access Statistics for this article

Canadian Journal of Economics is edited by David Green

More articles in Canadian Journal of Economics from Canadian Economics Association
Address: Canadian Economics Association Prof. Steven Ambler, Secretary-Treasurer c/o Olivier Lebert, CEA/CJE/CPP Office C.P. 35006, 1221 Fleury Est Montréal, Québec, Canada H2C 3K4
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Prof. Werner Antweiler ().